top of page

Intel Chief Jay Clayton Warns AI Companies: If Your Product Hacks a Website, “You Are Responsible”

1 day ago
3 min read

Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton is warning artificial intelligence companies that they will be held responsible when their technology hacks websites, as a new White House task force he leads begins setting rules for the industry.

“Well, let me be clear. Hacking of a government website, hacking of a private sector website — if your product does that, you are responsible,” Clayton said Saturday on Fox News’ “My View with Lara Trump.”

Quote card reading “Hacking of a government website, hacking of a private sector website — if your product does that, you are responsible.” attributed to Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton, over a darkened official portrait of Clayton.
Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton, on Fox News’ “My View with Lara Trump,” Oct. 17, 2026. Background: Clayton’s official portrait (ODNI, public domain).

WHAT JAY CLAYTON SAID

Clayton, who was recently put in charge of the newly announced Super Intelligence Force (SIF), said the government had already stepped in after recent reports that Anthropic’s AI models submitted a visa application to the State Department and a false homicide tip to police, Fox News reported.

“We immediately told Anthropic, ‘You need to get in there and assist the entities that have had this happen to them, patch their systems and prevent this from happening again.’ And I fully expect them to do that,” Clayton said.

He rejected the idea that increasingly autonomous AI systems have “a life of their own” that frees companies from responsibility. “I think there’s been a reset, and it’s now our job to enforce that reset,” he said.

Clayton said he would focus on three areas when AI agents go rogue: detection, reporting and response. He said Americans want to know “that we are the cop on the beat,” and that the government is requiring frontier labs “to address any harms,” according to Fox News.

A 120-DAY CLOCK

The SIF was given 120 days to recommend AI guardrails to the president that keep Americans safe without stifling innovation, Fox News reported. Its leaders also include FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson, Department of War Chief Technology Officer Emil Michael and Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor, who report to President Trump and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, according to Fox News.

Breitbart News reported that the White House AI task force chaired by Clayton adopted its charter Thursday after its first official meeting, opening a 120-day window. Citing Semafor, Breitbart reported that the panel will commission a report from the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology on AI risk covering cybersecurity and critical-infrastructure protection, biosecurity and dual-use applications, and model control and accountability.

Under the plan described by Breitbart, Michael will develop protocols for labs to report breaches, hacks and other cyber incidents to the government, and Ferguson will lead a law-enforcement and consumer-protection committee that includes the Justice Department.

A DIFFERENT EMPHASIS FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Last month, Attorney General Todd Blanche rejected calls for new AI-specific laws, saying existing laws already let the government go after bad actors. “Everybody’s saying more laws, more laws, more regulation, but we don’t need it. We don’t need it right now,” Blanche said on Fox News on Sept. 27. “If somebody’s behind that, if there’s entities that are bad actors… we have the tools to prosecute them.”

Clayton, a former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, told the Wall Street Journal that the administration’s priority is keeping the United States ahead of China, according to Breitbart. “The risk of not being first is high,” he said.

Anthropic’s response to Clayton’s remarks was not included in the reports.

Sources: Fox News (Oct. 18, 2026); Breitbart News (Oct. 17, 2026), citing Semafor and the Wall Street Journal; Fox News (Sept. 27, 2026).

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating*
bottom of page